<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:michaelkenward.blog.co.uk,2009-11-11:/</id><title>Michael Kenward</title><link rel="self" href="http://michaelkenward.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://michaelkenward.blog.co.uk/"/><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-11T07:19:42+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:michaelkenward.blog.co.uk,2007-01-18:/2007/01/18/the_invisible_blog~1575000/#c2612152</id><title>In response to:The invisible blog</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://michaelkenward.blog.co.uk/2007/01/18/the_invisible_blog~1575000/#c2612152"/><author><name>michaelkenward</name></author><published>2007-01-18T22:51:29+01:00</published><updated>2007-01-18T22:51:29+01:00</updated><content type="html">Well, that didn't take long.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I suspect you are correct. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The person I spoke to added a single item in July. They then left it to fester. With a main page that had holes for pictures and profile.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
No idea how they expected the world to find their messages.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</content></entry><entry><id>tag:michaelkenward.blog.co.uk,2007-01-18:/2007/01/18/the_invisible_blog~1575000/#c2608447</id><title>In response to:The invisible blog</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://michaelkenward.blog.co.uk/2007/01/18/the_invisible_blog~1575000/#c2608447"/><author><name>annbradley</name></author><published>2007-01-18T16:36:53+01:00</published><updated>2007-01-18T16:36:53+01:00</updated><content type="html">I am here because you were shown on right-screen as a recent blogger when I logged on so I dropped in.&lt;br&gt;
The invitation to comment is not the same as usual which threw me a bit though. Has all sorts of odd requirements that I plan to ignore.&lt;br&gt;
Your friends were just unlucky with timing I suppose.&lt;br&gt;
Byee</content></entry></feed>
