<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>Michael Kenward</title><link>http://michaelkenward.blog.co.uk/</link><description></description><language>en-UK</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:The invisible blog</title><description>Well, that didn't take long.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I suspect you are correct. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The person I spoke to added a single item in July. They then left it to fester. With a main page that had holes for pictures and profile.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
No idea how they expected the world to find their messages.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://michaelkenward.blog.co.uk/2007/01/18/the_invisible_blog~1575000/#c2612152</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:51:29 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:The invisible blog</title><description>I am here because you were shown on right-screen as a recent blogger when I logged on so I dropped in.&lt;br&gt;
The invitation to comment is not the same as usual which threw me a bit though. Has all sorts of odd requirements that I plan to ignore.&lt;br&gt;
Your friends were just unlucky with timing I suppose.&lt;br&gt;
Byee</description><link>http://michaelkenward.blog.co.uk/2007/01/18/the_invisible_blog~1575000/#c2608447</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:36:53 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
